Woodworking Plans Not as easy as it seems Santa Fe Valley (also known later as the Santa Fe ... and take it home later before making it into a settlement or you will lose everything ... Author of The outlaws, A Love to Cherish, Caress and Conquer, Tender Fury, ... post Mar 27 Jewelry box dragon box $40 [block:multiblock=42] WinCo Foods is ...Building A Horse Stable Costs Of Production
Tuesday, July 14th, 2009 | by matthew mcglynn
Woodworking Planshow to Woodworking Plans for While recording audiobooks for family use, I discovered that I could reduce the amount of room reverb and even some of the ambient noise in the track by building a foam box around the microphone. My reasoning was that even though I didn’t have an isolation booth, at least the mic could have one.
I was surprised to see later that this idea is a legitimate voiceover product, targeted at people who do VO work on the road and need a portable studio setup. (Search the web for “Porta-Booth” to find this — current retail price is $129.)
It forced the question that comes up around here a lot — what does it sound like, really? Does it make any difference?
It didn’t seem necessary to spring for the fancy collapsible box and precut foam for 1 last update 2020/07/09 just to test the concept. I had a piece of 4'' Auralex Studiofoam for the back, and 3'' convoluted acoustic foam for the top, bottom, and sides. The inside measured about 20'' deep by 16'' tall by 10'' wide.It forced the question that comes up around here a lot — what does it sound like, really? Does it make any difference?
It didn’t seem necessary to spring for the fancy collapsible box and precut foam just to test the concept. I had a piece of 4'' Auralex Studiofoam for the back, and 3'' convoluted acoustic foam for the top, bottom, and sides. The inside measured about 20'' deep by 16'' tall by 10'' wide.
With a boom stand on the side, I lowered a large-diaphragm condenser microphone into the box, and covered the top with more foam.
I was in a big room with high ceilings, which I think affected the results. Listen for yourself:
The difference seems pretty subtle. In fact if you’re not listening through headphones you might not hear it at all. Which either means my box just wasn’t working, or that particular room wasn’t causing a lot of bad reflections. I think it’s the latter. In any case, both samples sound pretty good.
Both of these sound terrible, but the difference between the two is certainly more audible.
The size of the box might make a difference — a smaller box, or at least a box with a smaller front opening, would probably sound deader. I would have had to start cutting up foam to try this, so I didn’t. If all the edges of the box would be tight, that would probably reduce reflections somewhat too. And it might have helped to push the mic farther back into the box.
Nonetheless, I think these tests yield two useful conclusions:
See also my Neophyte’s Guide to Home Voiceover Recording.
Any real VO engineers out there with opinions to share?
thanks for the test. Nice job.
Most likely, the lack of results have to do with the size of the foam panels used, as well as the thickness of the panel. Or more accurately, the low frequency limits of its absorption effectiveness.
We ran similar tests for our Portable Vocal Booth, which you can hear for yourself in the videos on the page. This PVB unit is large enough (2 – 2’x2′ panels hinged together) to really make a clearly audible difference. Each panel is 1″ thick and is effective down to about 200Hz.
More importantly, when used for VO or vocal tracking, the unit is large enough to absorb much of the voice sound on its way out into the room, preventing the room from resonating as much in the first place. Then, when you place the mic inside the PVB hinge, it also absorbs room reflections on their way back into the mic. The size of the unit is why it performs so well.
I have 2 PVBs and use them literally on every session. The difference is not subtle.
Woodworking Planshow to Woodworking Plans for July 15th, 2009 at 10:01 am
Nice! I posted something similar to this, I made a make-shift reflection filter of sorts. You can check it out here:
You went a step further, and I think you got better results. Thanks for sharing!
I don’t really think that’s all that subtle. You can really hear the box deaden the reflections and take off a bunch of the top end. Way less bright and a lot more focused sounding.
Woodworking Planshow to Woodworking Plans for The room echo without the box in the first clip is not so much now, but will probably be amplified by effects like chorus and reverb plugins. The deader the better. I think I will build that box. I have for 1 last update 2020/07/09 heard you should have a meter to the foam from the sound source, i.e. the mouth, but this seem to work just fine.The room echo without the box in the first clip is not so much now, but will probably be amplified by effects like chorus and reverb plugins. The deader the better. I think I will build that box. I have heard you should have a meter to the foam from the sound source, i.e. the mouth, but this seem to work just fine.
I also don’t think the difference is subtle. I’ve done similar things, you’ve discovered part of what I learned quite a while ago. A cardioid mike cares only a little what acoustic treatment you use off axis. Try the same test, with the same cardioid mic, but position some absorption BEHIND the speaker (as in on-axis). You’ll hear the difference.
I have used a cheap foam mattress (20cm x 155cm x 200 cm) and a blanket as an improvised vocal booth. Bent into u-shape, with a blanket laid on top and over the open side. The resulting space is a bit small though. Nevertheless you can easily fit a normal mic stand in it, and the vocalist can be placed sitting halfway inside the U. The mattress damps sound with a quarter wavelength shorter than the thickness of the material, in my case above maybe 500 Hz.
As a result I got a very dry recording. The mattress also damped what little sound my macbook pro made, with a distance of the 1 last update 2020/07/09 only 1 meter between laptop and mic.As a result I got a very dry recording. The mattress also damped what little sound my macbook pro made, with a distance of only 1 meter between laptop and mic.
I am an at-home VO talent, looking to improve the quality of my recordings. I am a technical num-num and would like some advice. I have read the posts, and am still a little confused as to what would work best to create that studio sound. I currently record inside of my walk in closet. It ix 5′ x 6 ‘, carpet, 9’ ceilings. There are clothes on one wall, and no other insulation on the other three. I would like to also deaden the sound of my laptop fan.. I use a large diaphram condenser mic. [email protected]
[…] à me bricoler une boîte anti-écho pour l’enregistrement, un peu dans le même sens que ce guide. Je possède ce merveilleux microphone USB (zéro […]
[…] short, small rooms are a problem. The smaller the room, the bigger the problem. As a gag, I once recorded some vocals in a toilet stall. No pun intended, but the results really did sound like […]
Great idea I’m just starting v o work thanks for sharing I’m going to make my own and and post photos when I’m finished.